Thursday, April 29, 2010

San Francisco is outraged....

They are boycotting all things Arizona (I am sure Arizona is soooo upset.....)

Well, San Fran, I doubt Arizona would be having the problems its having if self-righteous cities, like yourself, didnt declare themselves "Sanctuary" cities. You basically told everyone willing to break the immigration laws, to just come right in.... And how do they get to you, holier than thou, San Fran? They have to cross in TX, NM, AZ, or CA....

I am sure the border states thank you for being so selfless in giving law breakers a break.

Immigration reform isnt about racism. In fact, if you think about it, an undocumented person is in a unique position to be victimized. They are kept at low wages, they are forever afraid of being found out, they are linguistically disadvantaged.

To promote ILLEGAL immigration is racist - it lacks a caring about people as created beings, endowed by our Creator.....

To ask people to sign the guest book on the way in isnt saying we dont want you, it says, welcome - we do want you, but we want to know who is staying with us. To lack this basic courtesy is theft - outright theft.

Do not let anyone tell you, you are racist for opposing ILLEGAL immigration. Do not get caught in a semantics debate - ITS ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION....these arent undocumented citizens - these arent citizens at all.... To ask that these laws be enforced are no more outrageous than asking for DWI laws to be enforced, identity theft laws or any other laws that people are held accountable to....unless you are in this administration, then you dont have to pay your taxes....but I digress....

And if you find yourself on the side of San Fran, for the love, people, you dont help your cause when you smash refried beans on things - that is just nasty....

2 comments:

Mayberry said...

Screw San FranSicko....

Brad K. said...

Pearls,

I *love* the snark, that Obama hates the new Arizona law, 'cause he might have to actually produce a birth certificate (if he can find the address in Kenya).

It seems like "sanctuary" cities should be able to decide their own organization, their own values, and accept the consequences. Perhaps they would be as generous, if the Dept. of Ed. and Dept. of Transportation cut off all funds to the city. And perhaps cut off all national data access for their law enforcement. Perhaps create a border zone, with border patrols, around the city? Forbid US Navy ships to visit or homeport in SF, implement a modest $2 toll for anyone exiting the rest of the nation entering into San Francisco on US highways and Interstate roads. Oh, I could get creative - forbid them dumping trash outside the city limits, a surcharge on all electricity grid energy, close all federal facilities - like sea port customs operations, thus closing the ability for ocean-going transport to bring in anything from . . outside US territories.

Oklahoma is setting out on a path to establish we can do what seems right. But we are doing this by setting the laws to limit what needs limited. SF is just saying, "Well, it is against the law, but for this law we don't care."

It seems wrong to let SF encourage and support illegal immigration - and expect to spend tax dollars gathered all over California and across America to feed and house them, and provide medical care.